Weather is not climate. Just because we have had an extremely cold winter, the likes of which we haven’t seen for 30 years, doesn’t mean that Global Warming has stopped! Or does it?
None of us can have failed to notice the increasingly polarised (unintended pun) views of the skeptics and alarmist camps when it comes to the man made global warming argument. The recent publication of the emails floating around the University of East Anglia has lit the touch paper on a whole new level of discussion with the number of searches taking place on the term “climategate” going through the roof.
I have tried to follow the debate and apply my limited intelligence – but to no avail. What is interesting though is that I am becoming increasingly aware of individuals that are perceived to be major “players” in the debate. Firstly, there is a chap called Michael Mann in the US that produced a graph a few years ago showing his version of history of global temperatures. This graph has caused a bit of a fuss such that it now has its own name - the “hockey stick” graph. Al Gore and the IPCC have reprinted the graph and publicised it as illustrating, as “settled science” that the world is heating up – not only that – it is heating up at an unprecedented and alarming rate.
After a while, the sceptics camp got their act together and set about rubbishing the graph. Apparently, because thermometres hadn’t been invented a thousand years ago, Mann used other measures called “proxies” (such as tree ring data) to give temperatures for the past. Michael Mann became the chief target for the skeptics and his online profile has risen from faceless propeller-head to the devil incarnate insofar as the skeptics are concerned.
Mann’s qualifications, integrity, morals and ethics have been questioned openly on the Internet and his personal and professional reputation is under threat.
Meanwhile, Dr Rejander Pachauri who is Head of the IPCC has found the Internet turning against him. A little while ago, a search of his name would have revealed many responses referring to conference speeches, reports, conferences, etc i.e. all good stuff. However, Dr Pachauri is now finding his reputation under fire with questions regarding potential conflicts of interest (it is alleged he benefits financially from the very “cap and trade” markets that he has promoted through the IPCC) and the fact that he is oft quoted as being one of “the world’s leading climate scientists” when it is alleged that his degree is actually in Railroad Engineering.
From the skeptics camp, Steve McKintyre, Senator Fielding from Australia, and our very own Lord Monckton are personalities that have risen to the fore.
These are very extreme examples of the power of the Internet and its ability to provide information about individuals. Search their names if you want to find out more. The point is, the Internet is increasingly seen as the source of information about someone or something.
For us mere mortals that are not at the centre of world events, we will not face the issues that the personalities mentioned above will have to face. However, knowing what appears in response to a search of our name on Google and managing, as far as possible, the image the we portray online is hugely important to our careers and our lives.
If you would like some help – call me!