Archive for November, 2009

Entry Number: 30 DATE: November 24, 2009

In my role as Managing Director of De Leon, I get to deliver, and receive, a number of business presentations. 

Since I started out as a rookie 30 years ago, and on various occasions subsequently, I have attended courses where brushing up on public speaking skills has been part of the agenda.   I can recall courses where we have spent half an hour discussing how to stand!  Other courses have talked about the “voice” that you use when speaking, whilst others have concentrated on content and format.

The world has moved on and a quick search on the Internet will take you to lots of advice from all sorts of professionals on, for instance, the “5 killer things to remember when giving a presentation” or ” 3 ways to “wow” your audience”.  Many of these are USA based sites and are, quite frankly, a bit scary.

There are videos produced by super-confident individuals showing themselves in action – often talking about the art of public speaking.  But here’s the thing.  So many of them are totally contradictory!

For instance, one site says that PowerPoint is dead.  It argues that “Death by PowerPoint” has now entered the vocabulary and the instant anyone switches on a projector - everyone sees it as cue to fall asleep.  Other sites say that the combination of the spoken word together with images and the written word are unbeatable and that recipients retain X% more when PowerPoint is used in conjunction with the spoken word.

Other sites talk about the format of a presentation.  “Tell ’em what you are gonna tell ‘em, Tell ‘em, Tell ‘em what you told ’em” is the universally (almost) excepted format of choice.  However there is also video online by a very accomplished speaker saying that if you show an agenda that indicates this format then you might as well change the phrase to “Tell ‘em how you are going to bore ’em, bore ‘em, tell ‘em how you bored ‘em”!

“Stand still and don’t make hand gestures – you will distract your audience”, or,  ”move around your stage, make eye contact with different individuals at different times, use your body to emphasise points and to illustrate your enthusiasm and passion for the subject”.

As for the “voice” thing – don’t go there!  Unless you are using your “presentation voice” most of the time this is doomed to failure.  If you start a presentation when you are little nervous and keyed up then you can usually “act” a coached “voice”.  However, as you get into the presentation, you relax, you start to enjoy yourself and you end up doing a reverse “Pygmalion”.  You start sounding like you were brought up at  Eton and end up sounding like you were eaten and brought up (this joke doesn’t work quite so well when it’s written down). 

One of the great things about being middle aged is that you become less self conscious as you get older and I guess I’ll just have to keep doing what comes natual – and hope for the best! 

Philp Westerman De Leon Personal Reputation Mangement

Entry Number: 22 DATE: November 3, 2009

As part of what I do, I get alerts from Google on mentions of particular items/phrases. One of the phrases I watch out for is, of course, “personal reputation management”. Over the last couple of months I have been alerted to various items and research statistics including:

♦  33% of people routinely search someone’s name (their name, not the name of their firm) before contacting them in a business context.

♦  Up to 77% of potential clients, partners or prospects use Google, at some point, to research the background of an individual working for a potential supplier or business contact.

♦  87% of us believe that the CEO’s reputation is an important part of a company’s reputation

♦  78% of executive recruiters routinely use search engines to learn more about candidates

♦  35% have eliminated candidates based upon information found

I can’t actually vouch for the accuracy of the research but, based upon my own experience, together with the anecdotal experience of colleagues, contacts and acquaintances, I don’t think that they are far off.

So in summary, lots of us are routinely conducting name searches on individuals that we are thinking of contacting in a business context and, up to 77% have used this method at some point. The vast majority of us also believe that the personal reputation of the boss of a firm is very important to their company.

In the jobs market, executive recruiters use name search as a “standard” tool and our online reputations are a potentially a very important part of the decision making process.

What happens if someone searches your name on Google? Are the results helping, hindering or non-existent? Give me a call (0845 2994229) if you need some help or advice.

Philip Westerman, De Leon